Rscheearch?
This
is really weird. Read on
Aoccdrnig to a
rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the
ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and
lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you
can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos
not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Aoccdrnig to
a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr
the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist
and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and
you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid
deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
After having seen this the first time, in an email of course, I did some more research of my own. All I had to do was paste the jumbled “research at Cambridge University” or ”rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy” into a Google Search engine, and came up with several articles and blogs about it.
Don’t be deceived by the ease at which you could read that paragraph. This article http://blogs.msdn.com/fontblog/archive/2005/11/16/493452.aspx claims that the words were chosen carefully and another writer claims it is the length of the word that makes the difference. And of course another claims that no matter what the truth is, there was no research done about this sort of thing at Cambridge anyway .
This
one
http://blogs.msdn.com/fontblog/archive/2006/05/09/594050.aspx
claims to have done research clocking the speeds to show how much
slower the jumbled reading really was. I’m sure if you check out these
blogs or do a Google search, you will keep yourself busy surfing from
one site to another. OK OK, So it doesn’t take much to amuse me, but
check it out anyway.
Most of the seemingly
possible but bizarre stories that come your way by email are
exaggerations at best and complete hoaxes at worst. I use two quick
sources to determine the validity of most urban legends and pass the
truth and a link to the site on to my mis-informed friends. There are
probably others but my favorite are www.snopes.com and http://urbanlegends.about.com/.
It's really fun responding to my brother in law and
letting him know his story is a hoax. Just kidding Mark. He's
a busy guy.
